I have confirmed that our software is the latest releases, in which USB version 126.96.36.199, Controller Driver version is 0.9.3, Controller Service version is 0.9.7 and EyeX version is 0.8.16.811.
In our case, I only tested the performance using the program in EyeX SDK which is based on the EyeX Engine. And I saw the EyeX Setting Panel , EyeX Engine and EyeX for Windows occupied the most resources of CPU. According to your SDK’s descriptions, will GazeSDK use the processes I listed above? If not,could it be true that I would get better performance and have my problem above solved, if I consider using GazeSDK which implement the function of EyeX at low_level?